Archive | Immigration RSS feed for this section

Islam conquers the UK

3 Dec

What have we done to our country?  Look at this extract from a national newspaper.

The Independent, Wednesday 03 December 2014

Muhammed has become the most popular name for baby boys in the UK!

Research by the Baby Centre combined spelling variations to put it at the top of the list of the most used boys’ name in 2014!


The Office for National Statistics (ONS) came to the same conclusion with its official figures for England and Wales.

Oliver was the number one name until the spellings of 3,499 Muhammads, 2,887 Mohammeds and 1,059 Mohammads were combined, giving a total of 7,445 babies.

Some have argued that if those are to be taken as the same name, then so should British variations such as Oliver and Ollie, James and Jim, which would overtake Mohammed in all its incarnations.

Variations of Mohammed are the most popular boys’ names in the UK But Arabic experts say the comparison is a false one, because the differences with Mohammed arise only from the transliteration from Arabic (محمد) into Roman characters.

A spokesperson from the Arab British Centre, which works to improve understanding of the Arab world in the UK, said that despite its variations, Mohammed is unquestionably the same name.

“Because Arabic is a phonetic language, it means that when people spell it out the letters can’t directly represent the sounds so you end up with different vowels and things like that,” she said.

“Even though people write it differently it’s still the exact same name, unlike Ollie and Oliver, because people have shortened it.”

Variations can include Mohamad, Mohamed, Mohammad, Mohammed, Muhamad, Muhamed, Muhammad, Muhammed, Muhammet and many more. Shortenings include Mo and Mohd, which were not counted in the data.



See also:





Immigration – Cameron’s ridiculous response.

30 Nov

So, at last David Cameron announces the Government’s plans to deal with immigration. What do we get? We get a headline grabbing piece of misdirection that looks good but is practically useless – a weak and pusillanimous response to the problem that gets nowhere near the real issues and fears of the man in the street.

He plans to persuade the EU, by Treaty change, no less, that EU immigrants should not be eligible for State handouts within 4 years of their arrival. There are 260,000 new people coming into the country every year and this is the best he can come up with.

It is ridiculous at so many levels.

Firstly it will take 10 years to negotiate. Inevitably it will be watered down to something like 1 year. In the meantime we have to create the equivalent of a new large town every year.

Secondly, most EU immigrants do not come here for State handouts. They come here to find work and for the most part, they succeed. So the financial savings are small and will make little impact on EU immigration. And of course, EU immigration is not controllable. The treaties already signed decide that.

Thirdly, when the public say that they want immigration numbers to drop, they are not really talking about the EU at all. They are talking about the flood of asylum seekers who are given money, housing and all sorts of other help in priority over the indigenous population.

They are scared to talk about it but they are thinking of the vast number of people coming in from the Indian sub-continent, particularly the Muslim community.

These people have cultural values completely at odds with British values and they have no inclination to change. They talk peace but by their fruits we know them. They screech,”Discrimination” at every opportunity. They demand special rights and treatments. They are subject to a continuous stream of vitriol about Western values from their teachers. And they are a breeding ground for terrorists who bomb our streets and behead people on the streets of London. And their long term ambition is for the United Kingdom to be subject to the primitive and scary Sharia Law.

Come on David, get a grip on the real issues.

… The Primitive Ways of Sharia Law… Vladimir Putin

21 Nov

On August 04, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia.

In Russia, live like Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, it should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, and live the life of Muslims then we advise them to go to those places where that’s the state law.

Russia does not need Muslim minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell ‘discrimination’. We will not tolerate disrespect of our Russian culture.

We had better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims.

When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the Russian national interest first, observing that the Muslims Minorities Are Not Russians.”

The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation for this his shortest speech ever.

Good for them.


The Dialogue with Islam

3 Nov


1400 abused girls

28 Aug

The police have time to research posthumously the sexual crimes of Jimmy Saville, imprison Rolf Harris and prosecute Dave Lee Travis. Yet 1400 young girls, children, are systematically abused and raped over a 10 year period in Rotherham and despite being told about it again and again, the authorities, police and social services do nothing. Nobody arrested, no one in jail! Scandalous.

And why? The perpetrators were Muslims of Pakistani origin and the police were scared of being called racists or Islamophobes. They did not want to upset “social cohesion”.

But the real question, and the one no-one seems to ask,  is why the police are so scared. Why does this group get special privileges?

It is because  Muslims totally overreact to every perceived slight and we let them get away with it.  They threaten death, riots and suicide bombers.  They are like petulant children, only they are not children and the threats have proven to be real.  So, unbelievably, the police back off.

Far better to let 1400 young girls suffer both sexual and physical abuse.



Islamists ‘order mass FGM for Iraqi women’

25 Jul

The Times Hugh Tomlinson July 25 2014

Islamist militants have ordered all women and girls in the Iraqi city of Mosul to undergo female genital mutilation as they impose their brutal interpretation of Sharia, the United Nations said yesterday.

Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the al-Qaeda splinter group Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (Isis), was said to have issued a fatwa as “a gift to the people” ordering all females aged 11 to 46 to submit to forced circumcision.

Is this report true or is it propaganda?
Time will tell.

The thing is we have such a low opinion of these groups that we are happy to believe it is true.

How does a self proclaimed peaceful religion get such a bad reputation? By showing us again and again that whatever their words, the actions are violent.

I am sure the majority of Muslims are peaceful.  But they don’t really count.  There is a significant proportion who are not peaceful and it seems to me that the so-called peaceful ones collude with the violent ones.  How?  They don’t denounce them; speak out against them.  Why not?  Either they have sympathies or they are too afraid.  Members of  this peaceful religion live in fear!

That peaceful.


17 Jul

I was recently sent this anecdote.  It’s wicked but it resonates.

Jiggs McDonald, NHL Hall of Fame broadcaster, was speaking in Ontario and said,

“I am truly perplexed that so many of my friends are against another mosque being built in Toronto. I think it should be the goal of every Canadian to be tolerant regardless of their religious beliefs. Thus, the mosque should be allowed, in an effort to promote tolerance.

“That is why I also propose that two nightclubs be opened next door to the mosque, thereby promoting tolerance from within the mosque. We could call one of the clubs, which would be gay, ‘The Turban Cowboy,’ and the other a topless bar called ‘You Mecca Me Hot.’ Next door should be a butcher shop that specializes in pork, and adjacent to that an open-pit barbecue pork restaurant, called “Iraq of Ribs.”

“Across the street there could be a lingerie store called: “Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret,” with sexy mannequins in the window modelling the goods. Next door to the lingerie shop there would be room for an adult sex toy shop, “Koranal Knowledge,” its name in flashing neon lights, and on the other side a liquor store called “Morehammered.”

“All of this would encourage Muslims to demonstrate the tolerance they demand of us, so their mosque issue would not be a problem for others.” Yes, we should promote tolerance, and you can do your part by passing this on. And, if you are not laughing or smiling at this point, it is either past your bedtime, or it’s midnight at the oasis and time to put your camel to bed.”

Freezing Energy Prices

14 Jul

At the 2013 Labour Party conference, the flagship policy announcement by Ed Miliband was a 20 month freeze on energy prices.

Since then, we have had energy share price crashes, threats of blackouts and early price rises, energy companies saying it will destroy much needed investment in new capacity and so on.  There has been talk of Red Ed – Labour returning to it’s bad old ways.

All of these points need review but they all miss the real point.

We are up to our ears in debt, state handouts are completely out of control, we desperately need to encourage industry, unemployment is far too high especially for the young, we are under threat from terrorists, the NHS is struggling, the EU is a pain in the neck, immigration is at disaster levels, the Human Rights Act is in complete disrepute.

And what is the very best that Ed Miliband can come up with?

Freeze energy bills!

God preserve us from this man as our Prime Minister.


The majority of Muslims are peaceful

10 Jul

I am sure they are. But check this out.


We will out-breed you

6 Jul

In 1980, we employed a decorator to paint our house.

He told us that there was a local shop owned by a friendly Muslim.

One day, the Muslim said to him, “You must understand that we are at war with you and we will be at war until Britain is an Islamic state. And we will win this war without any fighting for one simple reason. We will out-breed you.”

That was 34 years ago. Look at the statistics.

In this article below from The Times it points out that 1 in 10 of the babies under 5 years old in the UK is Muslim. 1 in 10!
Also the number of Muslims in the UK grew from 1.6 million to 2.7 million in just 10 years, from 2001 to 2011!

The name ‘Oliver’ is no longer the most popular name given to new born baby boys in the UK.  The most popular name is Mohummad!

In the same article, the main thrust is that the poor old mosques are too overwhelmed by other work to spend enough time stopping imams from radicalising their youth. Taqiyya or what! (See previous post). Oh, that’s all right then.

On the evening news on BBC1 on 14th July 2014, when discussing police demographics in London, it was stated without comment that 40% of Londoners are Black or Asian! 40% of our capital city!


See also:



Muslims Lie To Us

5 Jul

They tell they are a religion of peace. That’s a lie. The Quran says there should be peace between Muslims. (But that is clearly not true.  They kill each other all over the place.) It also says that there is a Jihad, a holy war, until everyone in the world is a Muslim, either by persuasion or by force.  Whatever they say, their holy book, which is followed without question tells them they are at war with us, the infidel. We tend to ignore this inescapable fact.  Whatever they say, they are at war with us. Don’t be ridiculous, I hear you say. Now I come to the really scary bit – the Muslim principle of “Taqiyya”.

I  have no idea why we infidels are not told about it because it is much discussed and used by Muslims. Taqiyya says that it is perfectly acceptable for Muslims to lie and dissimulate to the infidel in the pursuance of Islam. So, for example, even at governmental levels, they might sign a treaty but it might be a dissimulation.  They will have no compunction to abide by it until something better comes along or they are strong enough to break it.

Today’s Muslims often try to justify Muhammad’s murder of poets and others who criticized him at Medina by saying that they broke a treaty by their actions. Yet, these same apologists place little value on treaties broken by Muslims. From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made to non-Muslim are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.

Leaders in the Arab world routinely say one thing to English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own people in Arabic. Yassir Arafat was famous for telling Western newspapers about his desire for peace with Israel, then turning right around and whipping Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews.

A Loving Religion

24 Jun

I am told that the vast majority of the people from one religion are good people and loving people.  I am sure they are.

Yet the items in the list below have all been done in the name of  that  religion and a great god.  Do we want the worry of having people with these thoughts mass migrating to our country?  And demanding that their legal system can sit side by side with ours?

We, of course,  must accept these little aberrations otherwise we are racist or committing the crime of religious intolerance.  And that can land us in jail. They are welcome in our country in great numbers.

  • Bombing buildings killing thousands
  • Hijacking aeroplanes
  • Kidnapping over 200 schoolgirls for going to school
  • Young men are seduced off to a sectarian war in another country then some of them come back threatening this country
  • Female genital mutilation
  • Beheading as a punishment in public
  • Stoning to death. the men buried to their waist so they might escape, women to their shoulders so they can’t
  • Death penalty for changing religion
  • Amputation as a punishment, arms and legs
  • Forced marriages
  • Underage marriages
  • “Honour” killing of female relatives for going out with someone from a different religion or sect
  • Grooming of white girls for sex then selling them for prostitution
  • Punishing someone by gang raping his sister, who then has to commit suicide because she has bought dishonour to the family
  • Death penalty after accusing raped women of adultery
  • Anti music and dance
  • Death penalty for minor insult to the leader
  • Assassination of journalists and soldiers in the street
  • Open hatred of my (western) values
  • Insisting that women cover themselves in public
  • Segregating boys and girls at school
  • Beating children who do not learn the holy book well enough


Mass Immigration

30 Mar

If “Racism” is the hatred of other races, then let’s define “Waterism” as the hatred of water.

I like a glass of water.  I like rain.  I like the ebb and flow of the tides.  I like lakes.  I am not waterist.

But for all that I hate tsunamis.  So am I a waterist or merely a “tsunami-ist”?

Yet people who complain against mass immigration are labelled Racists.  No they’re not.

It’s not hard

The Housing Shortage? No, the country is full

13 Jun

Apparently, there is a housing shortage. People are living with their parents until they are in their thirties. Not enough houses are being built. Yet thousands of houses are being built. Planning rules are being eased. Green belt is eaten away.

There is no housing shortage. The reality is that the country is full. There are more people than houses. Yet we continue to allow 250,000 new people into the country every year. A new city every year!

When will it stop?

The Labour Home Secretary, David Blunkett, famously said that immigration was self limiting. He said that he would continue to allow immigration until the country became so unpleasant that immigration would dry up!

Thanks David. Your policy is being implemented