Immigration into the UK under Labour

24 Mar

Why is this story not more widely publicised? It’s scandalous.

In 2003 the then Home Secretary, David Blunkett MP, stated during a BBC TV interview that he could see “no obvious limit” to immigration into the UK. When asked if there was a maximum population that could be housed within the UK, he replied: “no, I don’t think so” – adding that he believed the net immigration rate (then running at approximately 170,000 per year) was “permanently sustainable”.11

Labour threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a more multicultural country, a former Government adviser has revealed. 

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”, according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

He said Labour’s relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to “open up the UK to mass migration” but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its “core working class vote”. 

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.

Critics said the revelations showed a “conspiracy” within Government to impose mass immigration for “cynical” political reasons.

Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.

Writing in the Evening Standard, he revealed the “major shift” in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

He wrote a major speech for Barbara Roche, the then immigration minister, in 2000, which was largely based on drafts of the report.

He said the final published version of the report promoted the labour market case for immigration but unpublished versions contained additional reasons, he said.

He wrote: “Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural. 

Blunkett: No limit on migration
 
Legal migrants bring valuable skills, says Blunkett
There is “no obvious limit” to the number of immigrants who could settle in the UK, the home secretary has said.
David Blunkett agreed some people felt swamped by new arrivals, but said legal migrants brought economic benefits.

He said Britain had always been “crowded”, and the current net inflow of 172,000 a year was sustainable.

Campaign group Migration Watch attacked his comments, saying this rate plus illegal entries meant two million more people by 2013.

This would have a “huge impact” on the country, it said.

The latest official migration estimates, published hours after Mr Blunkett’s comments, suggest the inflow – the difference between the numbers leaving the UK and those arriving – fell slightly to 153,000 in 2002.

 It is a crowded island – we’ve always been a crowded, vigorous island  
David Blunkett

Could migration boost economy?
Farms ‘rely on migrant workers’
Speaking on BBC Two’s Newsnight, Mr Blunkett said he was determined to cut the numbers of asylum seekers and illegal immigrants entering the UK.

But he wanted more skilled workers to come to Britain legally to plug staff shortages – especially in the catering, hospitality and construction industries.

Asked whether there was any limit on the number of skilled migrants who could arrive, Mr Blunkett said: “No, I see no obvious limit.

“I see a balance in terms of the different forms of entry, migration and residency in this country so that we can get it right.”

He said he did not believe there was a maximum population which could be housed in the country, saying: “I don’t think there is.”

‘Astonishing’

Current migration rates were “permanently sustainable” as long as illegal immigration was under control, he added.

Economic migrants contributed £2.5bn more in taxes than they took out in benefits, he said.

“If we can get it in balance and make sure that there is a net increase in terms of our GDP, we are onto a winner,” he said.

He added: “It is a crowded island. We’ve always been a crowded, vigorous island.”

Problem

Sir Andrew Green, of Migration Watch, said he was “astonished” by Mr Blunkett’s comments.

 There is widespread concern that the government have expanded the scope of legal migration as a way to cover up their failure to tackle widespread abuse of the asylum system  
David Davis,
Shadow home secretary

A change of policy?
“We have no problem with moderate and managed migration. The problem is that it is neither moderate nor managed,” he said.

The official Home Office figures, plus illegal immigration, meant at least two million people would be entering the UK over the next 10 years, he said.

“England is nearly twice as crowded as Germany, four times as crowded as France, 12 times as crowded as the US. I can’t think what they are doing.”

Shadow home secretary David Davis suggested the government was encouraging legal migration “as a way to cover up their failure to tackle widespread abuse of the asylum system”.

He said changes to immigration policy should take place only after a debate about the economic, social and environmental consequences.

But Keith Best of the Immigration Advisory Service praised the Home Secretary, saying he believed the comments would ultimately “flush out” those using misleading statistics to oppose migration.

“It’s a pity that David Blunkett did not say this earlier,” said Mr Best.

“It is business which wants the workers and the govenrmen’s job is to facilitate this.

But the biggest commitment Mr Blunkett needs to make is to improve the statistics so we can have a rational debate.”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: